Privacy Policy
 Terms Of Use
 Publications


 NEW!
Translations
CLICK HERE

 
NEW FREE NOMENCLATURE RISK FACTORS BASIC SCORE IN SEVEN LANGUAGES
 

ABOUT THE SCORE
 

DEVELOPMENT
The motivation behind the Complexity Score Project was a growing frustration of pediatric cardiac surgeons over the fact that their surgical performance was being evaluated based on hospital mortality without regard for the complexity of the operations performed. A working group of Congenital Heart Surgeons from Europe and the United States decided to develop a risk-stratification method which could be adapted to our specialty. 

When starting this project in 1999, two difficulties were encountered: 1) Multi-institutional databases were just starting and there was no reliable data yet available. 2) Due to the absence of risk stratification, the more prominent centers dealing with the sickest patients and potentially having a significant mortality were very reluctant to send their data. It was, therefore, necessary to base this risk-adjustment on an evaluation that was largely subjective. Following many discussions, it was concluded that a subjective probability approach based on the consensus of a panel of experts was valid, provided that the risk-adjustment score is subsequently validated based on collected outcome data.

A group of 50 internationally accepted experts has been working for more than five years on a new method to evaluate the quality of care in Congenital Heart Surgery (CHS) that is called Aristotle. Senior, experienced congenital heart surgeons considered the possible risk factors for each procedure and assigned scores based on potential for mortality, potential for morbidity, and anticipated surgical difficulty. 

The Aristotle system, electronically available, has been introduced by both the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) as an original method to compare the performance of Congenital Heart Surgery (CHS) centers. Pediatric cardiologists have joined the project and are currently developing a complexity score for interventional cardiology procedures. 

 
COMPLEXITY CONCEPT
The Aristotle system is based on an original concept of complexity which is a constant for a given patient all over the world. Many variables can affect patient care performance, and most are difficult to define and are not constant among care providers or institutions. Complexity of a given patient with a specific medical condition undergoing a surgical procedure at a given time, however, is a constant regardless of the location around the globe. Defining complexity based on surgical procedures and the factors that may significantly modify the clinical outcomes of those procedures can provide the quantitative basis for evaluation of performance.

The complexity issue has generated more than 20 scientific presentations at various scientific societies including: American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS), STS, EACTS, Congenital Heart Surgeons Society (CHSS), European Congenital Heart Surgeons Association (ECHSA) and Association of European Pediatric Cardiology (AEPC).

 
WHY ARISTOTLE?
The project was named Aristotle, to support an approach based upon expert opinion, with reference to Aristotle’s writing (Rhetoric, Book I, 350 BC); “When there is no scientific answer available, the opinion (Doxa) perceived and admitted by the majority has value of truth.” 
 
COMPONENTS
The Aristotle adjustment method objectively rates the projected complexity of the surgical procedures performed. The complexity score is based on three subjective determinations; potential for mortality, potential for morbidity, and anticipated surgical difficulty. Complexity is calculated in two phases. First, the basic complexity of the procedure involved is scored. Scores range from 0.5 to 15.0. The Basic Aristotle Complexity Score rates only the simplest form of the procedure and does not take into consideration factors which can significantly alter the projected complexity and outcome of the operation. Second, specific value is added, based on a precise analysis of the associated pathology along with any co-morbid conditions potentially present.

The Comprehensive Aristotle Complexity Score considers other significant complicating factors which will impact on the eventual outcome. Procedure dependent factors include anatomical variations, associated procedures, and patient age, and can add a maximum of 5 points to the basic score. Procedure independent factors include patient characteristics which are more general, but have the potential to significantly affect the outcome. Procedure independent factors can add up to an additional 5 points. The mechanism used to assign scores defining the level of added complexity was same process that resulted in the Basic Aristotle Complexity Score.